Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 07.05.13 at 16:16, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/05/13 15:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 07.05.13 at 12:43, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable 
> FAIL"):
>>>> It looks like this passed all the tests -- it seems like a good
>>>> candidate for RC0 (or RC1, whatever we want to call it).
>>> It looks like we still need to update some sonames.  See patch below.
>>>
>>> Also, do we want to update the version number in the README ?  I think
>>> we probably do.
>>>
>>> I have tagged the qemu-xen-traditional tree with xen-4.3.0-rc1.
>>> Stefano, please make an appropriate tag in qemu-xen-upstream.
>>> We then need to update xen.git's Config.mk to refer to those tags.
>> Ian, I see you also tagged the Xen tree, but unfortunately without
>> updating the hypervisor revision to -rc1? Was that intentional? It's
>> not a dramatic problem (and I don't see a need to withdraw and
>> redo the tag), but maybe worth an addition to the checklist.
>>
>> George, am I taking it right that with the tagging of RC1 the tree
>> freeze is over, and I can commit the few fixes that accumulated
>> over the last couple of days? Or should I wait until the tagged
>> commit got pushed too?
> 
> I wrote in a different e-mail "The tree is now open for commits again", 
> but maybe you missed it because it was after the bit about the RTC bug.

No, I'm sorry for the noise:, I should have read _all_ xen-devel mails
before replying to this one.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel