[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next V2 2/3] xen-netback: avoid allocating variable size array on stack
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 13:04 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 02.05.13 at 12:43, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > @@ -934,11 +934,14 @@ static int netbk_count_requests(struct xenvif *vif, > > RING_IDX cons = vif->tx.req_cons; > > int slots = 0; > > int drop_err = 0; > > + int more_data; > > > > if (!(first->flags & XEN_NETTXF_more_data)) > > return 0; > > > > do { > > + struct xen_netif_tx_request dropped_tx = { 0 }; > > + > > No need for an initializer here. > > > if (slots >= work_to_do) { > > netdev_err(vif->dev, > > "Asked for %d slots but exceeds this > > limit\n", > > @@ -972,6 +975,9 @@ static int netbk_count_requests(struct xenvif *vif, > > drop_err = -E2BIG; > > } > > > > + if (drop_err) > > + txp = &dropped_tx; > > + > > memcpy(txp, RING_GET_REQUEST(&vif->tx, cons + slots), > > sizeof(*txp)); > > > > @@ -1001,7 +1007,13 @@ static int netbk_count_requests(struct xenvif *vif, > > netbk_fatal_tx_err(vif); > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > - } while ((txp++)->flags & XEN_NETTXF_more_data); > > + > > + more_data = txp->flags & XEN_NETTXF_more_data; > > + > > + if (!drop_err) > > + txp++; > > And no need for the conditional here afaict. I think it is needed, in the case where you've assigned txp = &dropped_tx you don't want to increment txp. Or perhaps it just gets reassigned back to &dropped_tx at the top of the next loop, so the increment doesn't matter. Subtle! I'm happy with whichever way Wei prefers, but it is probably worthy of a comment > > Jan > > > + > > + } while (more_data); > > > > if (drop_err) { > > netbk_tx_err(vif, first, cons + slots); > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |