Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/arm: account for stolen ticks

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:38 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > index d30042e..8f040a0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > >  #include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> > >  #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
> > >  #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
> > > +#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
> > >  #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> > >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > >  #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
> > > @@ -172,6 +173,8 @@ static int __init xen_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
> > >              later ones fail to. */
> > >           per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup;
> > >   }
> > > +
> > > + xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
> > 
> > Is this called for the boot processor too?
> 
> Yep.
> 
> > (do you have a linux-next branch where I can easily find the baseline
> > for this series?)
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sstabellini/xen.git lost_ticks_1

Is that your Xen tree, I was after the Linux one...

> It's based on my 3.9-rc3-smp-6 branch currently in linux-next (that is
> based on 3.9-rc3).
> However lost_ticks_1 is not in linux-next yet.

Which branch is in Linux next? It doesn't seem to be your linux-next
(last commit 2011).

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel