Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:41 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> On 30/04/2013 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > I fixed what was obvious, but I wonder where the OVMF/Tianocore
> > line originates from: This was disabled in 4.2 (as it didn't build except
> > with one specific gcc version iirc), and I didn't see its state change
> > in -unstable. And in any event - afaict - this is at best experimental.
> >
> > Jan
> Thank you Jan. Looking at the logs this line came from Ian Campbell 
> (added this to 4.2 on Sept 10 2012).

> I am happy to mark this as disabled (footnote [4]) and/or experimental. 
> Any views?

OK with me.

> On 30/04/2013 09:02, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
> > The description for vPMU is stated with "Virtual Power Management Unit 
> > for HVM guests". On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be "Virtual 
> > Performance Monitoring Unit"
> > So what is meant here?
> > Dietmar. 
> That is a good question. Again, looking at the logs, Ian Campbell added 
> these in the same batch as the item above. Probably just a typo. Please 
> somebody make a call and advise. I guess if it is Virtual Performance 
> Monitoring Unit, this line should probably also go into the "Tooling" header

I'm inclined to blame my own ignorance about what vPMU is, I seem to
remember someone (Dietmar?) correcting me on this other times too...

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel