Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/7] libxl: add new hotplug interface support to hotplug script callers

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 12:30 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> On 11/04/13 18:25, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Roger Pau Monne writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/7] libxl: add new hotplug 
> > interface support to hotplug script callers"):
> >> +The hotplug script should take special care in not storing arbitrary
> >> +values in the following entries:
> >> +
> >> +HOTPLUG_PATH/version
> >> +HOTPLUG_PATH/pdev
> > 
> > Do we want to allow any scope for introducing new toolstack-reserved
> > entries later ?
> 
> Would you agree to say that the script is not able to use entries
> beginning with libxl_*, so we can reserve that for later use?

Doesn't the toolstack have its own prefix, under which it could
duplicate HOTPLUG_PATH if it wanted?

Or maybe there is more benefit to having all the hotplug info about a
device in the same place to having things be nicely separated?

> 
> Also, if you could take a look at the rest of the series, I would like
> to try to respin the series before the end of the week.
> 
> > "... take special care not to store ..." would be correct grammar.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ian.
> > 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel