Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/8] kexec: add public interface for improved load/unload sub-ops

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/04/13 08:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 08.04.13 at 20:59, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> @@ -152,6 +152,63 @@ typedef struct xen_kexec_range {
>>      unsigned long start;
>>  } xen_kexec_range_t;
>>  
>> +#if __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ >= 0x00040300
>> +/*
>> + * A contiguous chunk of a kexec image and it's destination machine
>> + * address.
>> + */
>> +typedef struct xen_kexec_segment {
>> +    XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_64(const_void) buf;
>> +    uint64_t buf_size;
>> +    uint64_t dest_maddr;
>> +    uint64_t dest_size;
> 
> So you made uint64_aligned_t available in the previous patch,
> but now you don't use it?

It's not needed here.  Should I use uint64_aligned_t anyway?

It was easier to make both XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_64() and uint64_aligned_t
available than to make only one.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel