[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/arm: basic PSCI support, implement cpu_on
On 10/04/13 11:13, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 15:23 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 09/04/13 14:57, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 18:42 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>>> Implement support for ARM Power State Coordination Interface, PSCI in >>>> short. The current implementation is based on HVC and only supports the >>>> cpu_on call. >>> >>> Doesn't the PSCI interface require the use of SMC not HVC? >> >> You can use both, and KVM uses HVC. > > It makes good sense for Xen to follow suit then I think. > >>> I thought I heard Charles say at connect that there was now a PSCI v2, >>> and I suspect I'm looking at the v1 document (which mentions HVC only in >>> passing). Which interface did you implement? >>> >>> Anyhow, we can trap SMCs to the hypervisor by setting the right control >>> register bits. We should do this anyway -- no good can come of a guest >>> making a call direct to the monitor! >> >> Trapping guest access to Secure mode is always a good idea! ;-) > > :-) > >> Unfortunately, there's a catch on ARMv8. If the CPU doesn't implement >> secure mode, then SMC will UNDEF at the current exception level (not >> trapping to EL2). Which means that for ARMv8, you basically have to >> mandate HVC for PSCI at the HYP level... > > That pretty much seals it then! > > Do I infer that on v7 SMC w/o security extensions will trap? ARMv7 mandates security extensions if you have virtualization extensions, so this is a moot point... ;-) M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |