Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] libxl: xl mem-max et consortes must update static-max in xenstore too

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 16:17 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Daniel Kiper writes ("[PATCH v2 1/2] libxl: xl mem-max et consortes must 
> update static-max in xenstore too"):
> > xl mem-max et consortes must update static-max in xenstore too.
> > Without this patch there is no chance to increase memory reservation
> > for given domain above memory limit defined in config file. It means
> > that memory hotplug is practicaly unusable without this patch.
> 
> I haven't checked the details here but iirc there is a doc comment in
> libxl about guest memory management.

I think you are thinking of tools/libxl/libxl_memory.txt

As a more general comment do we want to separate the operations for
memory hotplug from those which just balloon a guest within its existing
static-max?

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel