Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] libxl: xl mem-max et consortes must update static-max in xenstore too

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Daniel Kiper writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] libxl: xl mem-max et consortes 
must update static-max in xenstore too"):
> xl mem-max et consortes must update static-max in xenstore too.
> Without this patch there is no chance to increase memory reservation
> for given domain above memory limit defined in config file. It means
> that memory hotplug is practicaly unusable without this patch.

Doesn't this, together with your previous patch, conflate the "static
maximum" (ie, boot-time memory size which in the absence of memory
hotplug can never be exceeded), with the "xen maximum" (ie the
enforced memory limit) ?

I thought that the static-max xenstore key was used for the former.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel