[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable

To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: akshay st <akshayts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 23:59:29 +0800 (SGT)
Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:00:09 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=trQhmMbflAVEq4zoz/tk3ftct7OxeWKl9HwCbrPUEcAt7sWH4twaWgZNFV8Zs0KBPQe2Gw5LfHoVRDbyFOgdLV3lgjbq1SbqMAdyZURq5t+novkSnm7lvVuQvl6levHfen0k+UMkYbHocBMZgkSISx0QSZkmLN+pjvyB3jdpPN4=;
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Hi,
I wanted to know if its safe to FLUSH TLB with IRQ Enable. Basically If i call 
local_flush_tlb_all() with IRQ's Enabled what is the consequence? How is it 
normally done in Linux/Xen.

Warm Regards,
Akshay


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable
  - From: George Dunlap

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] ocaml bindings [and 1 more messages]
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/ocaml: Correct META for libxl bindings
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Xen Crash
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.