|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/14] xen: arm: support for loading 64-bit zImage dom0
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is defined in linux/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/kernel.c | 80
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/kernel.c b/xen/arch/arm/kernel.c
> index e7f34a4..59844b0 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/kernel.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/kernel.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>
> #define ZIMAGE32_MAGIC 0x016f2818
>
> +#define ZIMAGE64_MAGIC 0x14000008
> +
> struct minimal_dtb_header {
> uint32_t magic;
> uint32_t total_size;
> @@ -99,6 +101,57 @@ static void kernel_zimage_load(struct kernel_info *info)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64
> +/*
> + * Check if the image is a 64-bit zImage and setup kernel_info
> + */
> +static int kernel_try_zimage64_prepare(struct kernel_info *info,
> + paddr_t addr, paddr_t size)
> +{
> + /* linux/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt */
> + struct {
> + uint32_t magic;
> + uint32_t res0;
> + uint64_t text_offset; /* Image load offset */
> + uint64_t res1;
> + uint64_t res2;
> + } zimage;
> + uint64_t start, end;
> +
> + if ( size < sizeof(zimage) )
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + copy_from_paddr(&zimage, addr, sizeof(zimage), DEV_SHARED);
> +
> + if (zimage.magic != ZIMAGE64_MAGIC)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Currently there is no length in the header, so just use the size */
> + start = 0;
> + end = size;
> +
> + /*
> + * Given the above this check is a bit pointless, but leave it
> + * here in case someone adds a length field in the future.
> + */
> + if ( (end - start) > size )
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + info->zimage.kernel_addr = addr;
> +
> + info->zimage.load_addr = info->mem.bank[0].start
> + + zimage.text_offset;
> + info->zimage.len = end - start;
> +
> + info->entry = info->zimage.load_addr;
> + info->load = kernel_zimage_load;
> +
> + info->type = DOMAIN_PV64;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
this function doesn't seem very different from kernel_try_elf_prepare:
do we really need two of them?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |