Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/SandyBridge: reserve pages when integrated graphics

["Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 9:07 PM
> To: Hao, Xudong
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; keir@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] xen/SandyBridge: reserve pages when integrated graphics
> 
> >>> On 25.03.13 at 13:39, "Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
> >> - removal of page 0x20110
> >
> > Linux kernel has put page 0x20110000 as bad, so we do not need to remove it
> > from bad page list.
> > Linux commit: a9acc5365dbda29f7be2884efb63771dc24bd815
> 
> So then your earlier response was misleading, or at least confusing
> me:
> 
> "I did not get detail spec either, but linux kernel has remove this page
>  0x20110000 already for the same reason, refer to commit:
>  a9acc5365dbda29f7be2884efb63771dc24bd815".
> 
> "Removed" to me meant removed from the list of bad PFNs. Note
> that I didn't look at the commit, I just took your response as
> confirming that this particular PFN got added to the list in error.

Sorry to confuse you, the earlier response really a little misleading. Actually 
I want to say this page is inaccessible for SandyBridge graphic device.

> Now that you say that you actually meant the exact opposite,
> we're back at the question why that PFN is in the list in the first
> place, considering that none of the spec updates say so.
> 
Let me try to find out the description on spec.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel