[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/8] evtchn: add FIFO-based event channel hypercalls and port ops
>>> On 19.03.13 at 22:00, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > +static int setup_control_block(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t gfn, uint32_t offset) > +{ > + struct domain *d = v->domain; > + struct evtchn_fifo_vcpu *efv; > + struct page_info *page; > + void *virt; > + int i; unsigned int (also elsewhere) > +struct evtchn_fifo_queue { > + volatile uint32_t *head; /* points into control block */ I still think that explicit barriers are the way to go. Unless Linux'es view on this has changed, you'll have issues getting the Linux folks to accept this. > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct evtchn > u16 virq; /* state == ECS_VIRQ */ > } u; > u32 port; > + struct evtchn_fifo_queue *queue; Wouldn't it be better (more space efficient) to store the queue array index rather than a pointer, considering that you expect to have thousands of event channels? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |