On 04.03.13 11:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.03.13 at 21:38, <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Adding AMD engineers to the list of AMD-specific components' maintainers.
I'm not questioning their technical expertise, but is it really intended
to keep the now non-AMD people on the list of maintainers? Having
too few maintainers for a component is certainly the bigger problem
(especially when it's effectively no-one), but having too many is also
not unlikely to cause issues (the most prominent of which being that
everyone assumes one of the others will take care of a specific item).
And of course being listed here means there also ought to be
activity, so it would be nice if everyone individually could confirm
that they're still going to have sufficient time to fulfill this role.
Hi Jan,
here is my patch to remove myself as AMD SVM maintainer.
Christoph
commit 18d15d117d42f7c2d6d76070c1216294068b45f5
Author: Christoph Egger <chegger@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Feb 7 14:12:32 2013 +0000
MAINTAINERS: Update my mail address
Remove myself as AMD SVM maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <chegger@xxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 241ce63..c906be3 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ F: xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/
AMD SVM
M: Andre Przywara <osp@xxxxxxxxx>
-M: Christoph Egger <Christoph_Egger@xxxxxx>
M: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxx>
S: Supported
F: xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/
@@ -202,7 +201,7 @@ S: Supported
T: hg http://xenbits.xen.org/XCP/linux-2.6.*.pq.hg
MACHINE CHECK (MCA) & RAS
-M: Christoph Egger <Christoph_Egger@xxxxxx>
+M: Christoph Egger <chegger@xxxxxxxxx>
M: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
S: Supported
F: xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
