[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] libxl: xl mem-set should not enforce memory limits
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 16:57 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:32:53PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 16:25 +0000, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > > xl mem-set should not enforce memory limits. If it does > > > > NB the title says libxl but this is actually an xl change. > > > > > then after decreasing reservation there is no chance to > > > increase reservation directly from guest domain by > > > writing to /sys/devices/system/xen_memory/xen_memory0/target* > > > > This is a feature not a bug I think. It is intentional that if the host > > admin sets a memory target the a guest admin cannot exceed that limit. > > Even thought 'xm' did not do it? Yes. Please check the archives, this was discussed at the time (at length IIRC) Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |