Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: extend diagnostics for "No irq handler for vector" messages

[Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 13/03/2013 12:49, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> By storing the inverted IRQ number in vector_irq[], we may be able to
> spot which IRQ a vector was used for most recently, thus hopefully
> permitting to understand why these messages trigger on certain systems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/i8259.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/i8259.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void _disable_8259A_irq(unsigned
>          outb(cached_A1,0xA1);
>      else
>          outb(cached_21,0x21);
> -    per_cpu(vector_irq, 0)[LEGACY_VECTOR(irq)] = -1;
> +    per_cpu(vector_irq, 0)[LEGACY_VECTOR(irq)] = ~irq;
>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq)
>  
>      for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp_mask) {
>          ASSERT( per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] == irq );
> -        per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = -1;
> +        per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = ~irq;
>      }
>  
>      desc->arch.vector = IRQ_VECTOR_UNASSIGNED;
> @@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq)
>      for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp_mask) {
>          ASSERT( per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[old_vector] == irq );
>          TRACE_3D(TRC_HW_IRQ_MOVE_FINISH, irq, old_vector, cpu);
> -        per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[old_vector] = -1;
> -     }
> +        per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[old_vector] = ~irq;
> +    }
>  
>      desc->arch.old_vector = IRQ_VECTOR_UNASSIGNED;
>      cpumask_clear(desc->arch.old_cpu_mask);
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ int __init init_irq_data(void)
>      int irq, vector;
>  
>      for (vector = 0; vector < NR_VECTORS; ++vector)
> -        this_cpu(vector_irq)[vector] = -1;
> +        this_cpu(vector_irq)[vector] = INT_MIN;
>  
>      irq_desc = xzalloc_array(struct irq_desc, nr_irqs);
>      
> @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ next:
>              goto next;
>  
>          for_each_cpu(new_cpu, &tmp_mask)
> -            if (per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] != -1)
> +            if (per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] >= 0)
>                  goto next;
>          /* Found one! */
>          current_vector = vector;
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
>  
>      /* Clear vector_irq */
>      for (vector = 0; vector < NR_VECTORS; ++vector)
> -        per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = -1;
> +        per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = INT_MIN;
>      /* Mark the inuse vectors */
>      for (irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; ++irq) {
>          struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ void irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(struct c
>          struct irq_desc *desc;
>          irq = __get_cpu_var(vector_irq)[vector];
>  
> -        if (irq == -1)
> +        if ((int)irq < 0)
>              continue;
>  
>          desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ void irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(struct c
>          TRACE_3D(TRC_HW_IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP,
>                   irq, vector, smp_processor_id());
>  
> -        __get_cpu_var(vector_irq)[vector] = -1;
> +        __get_cpu_var(vector_irq)[vector] = ~irq;
>          desc->arch.move_cleanup_count--;
>  
>          if ( desc->arch.move_cleanup_count == 0 )
> @@ -819,8 +819,22 @@ void do_IRQ(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>              if ( ! ( vector >= FIRST_LEGACY_VECTOR &&
>                       vector <= LAST_LEGACY_VECTOR &&
>                       bogus_8259A_irq(vector - FIRST_LEGACY_VECTOR) ) )
> +            {
>                  printk("CPU%u: No irq handler for vector %02x (IRQ %d%s)\n",
>                         smp_processor_id(), vector, irq, kind);
> +                desc = irq_to_desc(~irq);
> +                if ( ~irq < nr_irqs && irq_desc_initialized(desc) )
> +                {
> +                    spin_lock(&desc->lock);
> +                    printk("IRQ%d a=%04lx[%04lx,%04lx] v=%02x[%02x] t=%-15s
> s=%08x\n",
> +                           ~irq, *cpumask_bits(desc->affinity),
> +                           *cpumask_bits(desc->arch.cpu_mask),
> +                           *cpumask_bits(desc->arch.old_cpu_mask),
> +                           desc->arch.vector, desc->arch.old_vector,
> +                           desc->handler->typename, desc->status);
> +                    spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> +                }
> +            }
>              TRACE_1D(TRC_HW_IRQ_UNMAPPED_VECTOR, vector);
>          }
>          goto out_no_unlock;
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel