Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04 of 11 v3] xen: sched_credit: let the scheduler know about node-affinity

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 16:20 +0000, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On mar, 2013-03-12 at 15:57 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 11:01 +0000, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > As vcpu-affinity tells where VCPUs must run, node-affinity tells
> > > where they should or, better, prefer.
> > 
> > I cannot parse this sentence. Is the "or, better," redundant?
> > 
> I see... It's indeed redundant and it's a wording we sometime use in
> Italian, and translating it literally is not so much of a good idea, I
> guess. :-)

Not on this occasion ;-)

> How about "vcpu-affinity tells where VCPUs must run, node-affinity tells
> where they prefer to."

That's better, thanks.

> > And just a nit, it is "performance benefits".
> > 
> EhEh... George explained me this "performance" VS "performances" thing
> two times already, but so far I've always been able to always pick the
> _wrong_ one quite effectively! :-/

Choose one and then go for the opposite seems like a good rule of thumb
then ;-)

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel