[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: xennet: skb rides the rocket: 20 slots

To: ANNIE LI <annie.li@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:37:15 +0000
Cc: 'Steven Haigh' <netwiz@xxxxxxxxx>, "Palagummi, Siva" <Siva.Palagummi@xxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "msw@xxxxxxxxxx" <msw@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jacek Milewicz <jacekowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:37:33 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 05:22 +0000, ANNIE LI wrote:
> It is likely that coalescing work in netback you mentioned in thread(Is: 
> SKB_MAX_LEN bites again. Was: Re: bug disabling guest interface) is not 
> enough for some extremely large packets. So I assume the segment work in 
> netfront is also necessary.

I expect so too, although the segmentation thing seems like it is lower
priority, at least right now.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: xennet: skb rides the rocket: 20 slots
  - From: Sander Eikelenboom
- Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: xennet: skb rides the rocket: 20 slots
  - From: ANNIE LI

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/8] kexec: extend hypercall with improved load/unload ops
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Is: SKB_MAX_LEN bites again. Was: Re: bug disabling guest interface
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: xennet: skb rides the rocket: 20 slots
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: xennet: skb rides the rocket: 20 slots
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.