Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] QEMU(upstream): Disable xen's use of O_DIRECT by default as it results in crashes.

[Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

George,

--On 8 March 2013 10:28:32 +0000 George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> > Wait, aren't O_DIRECT and BDRV_O_NOCACHE required for safety?  That
> > is, without these flags isn't it possible that the guest OS thinks
> > that the data has made it onto stable storage, while in fact it's
> > still in dom0's memory?  Or am I missing something?
> And in any case, if it's a kernel bug it should be fixed in the kernel.
Well, in theory yes. In practice, it's a very difficult bug to fix it seems.
You need to track skbs.

Here's a set of patches which sort of fix it.

> Alex, which dom0 kernel are you using? I actually seem to recall this
> being a long-known bug with some versions of the pvops kernels; but I
> thought it had long since been fixed.  Kondrad / IanC, can you
> comment?
I'm using Ubuntu Precise's Kernel 3.2.0-32-generic on x86_64. However,
this bug is in every kernel back to (at least) 2007.

This thread is shorter that the one on xen-devel if you want to follow
the history:
 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/54325

> Alex, if that's the case and if you're using a distro kernel maybe you
> should try to push for a backport?
That would require it being fixed first!

In our lab we literally cannot boot Ubuntu cloud images (a standard
OS) as a guest without Xen crashing horribly using an NFS backend
without this patch. So, we have a choice. Either we work around the
kernel bug in Xen, or we wait until it's fixed in the kernel and
a very invasive backport is produced. Given the almost total lack
of interest in fixing this in the kernel (save for Ian Campbell's
patches which by his own omission he hasn't had the time to finish),
and given the fact that it's a one line fix in qemu, I know which
I prefer!

--
Alex Bligh

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel