Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/8] netback: don't bind kthread to cpu

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 04:00:02PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> The initialization process makes an assumption that the online cpus are
> numbered from 0 to xen_netbk_group_nr-1,  which is not always true.

And xen_netbk_group_nr is num_online_cpus()?

So under what conditions does this change? Is this when the CPU hotplug
is involved and the CPUs go offline? In which case should there be a
CPU hotplug notifier to re-bind the workers are appropiate?

> 
> As we only need a pool of worker threads, simply don't bind them to specific
> cpus.

OK. Is there another method of doing this? Are there patches to make the thread
try to be vCPU->guest affinite?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |    2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c 
> b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 3ae49b1..db8d45a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -1729,8 +1729,6 @@ static int __init netback_init(void)
>                       goto failed_init;
>               }
>  
> -             kthread_bind(netbk->task, group);
> -
>               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&netbk->net_schedule_list);
>  
>               spin_lock_init(&netbk->net_schedule_list_lock);
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel