Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] credit1: Use atomic bit operations for the flags structure

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 04.03.13 at 12:42, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/03/13 11:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 04.03.13 at 12:06, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Ping?
>> I could ack it, but wouldn't be permitted to commit without Keir's ack,
>> so it's all left to him... Same for the two credit2 patches of yours (I
>> reckon the resend today doesn't really have any changes over what
>> you had sent last week).
> 
> Is that how it works?  I thought the main point was just that everything 
> has to have a suitable ack, and not even committers can ack their own 
> stuff; so my SoB + your ack should be sufficient.

That's how I understand it - suitable ack meaning that another
maintainer has to ack it. Which I'm not for the scheduler code.
But I also pinged him to find out whether I should view this in
a little more relaxed way...

> That seems to be how IanC and IanJ do stuff.

They're both tools maintainers, however.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel