[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mm/x86: Flush lazy MMU when DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set
Greg, policy opinion? -hpa On 02/26/2013 03:57 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > ----- hpa@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> On 02/26/2013 02:56 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> When CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set page table updates made by >>> kernel_map_pages() are not made visible (via TLB flush) immediately >> if lazy >>> MMU is on. In environments that support lazy MMU (e.g. Xen) this may >> lead to >>> fatal page faults, for example, when zap_pte_range() needs to >> allocate pages >>> in __tlb_remove_page() -> tlb_next_batch(). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c >>> index ca1f1c2..7b3216e 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c >>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c >>> @@ -1369,6 +1369,8 @@ void kernel_map_pages(struct page *page, int >> numpages, int enable) >>> * but that can deadlock->flush only current cpu: >>> */ >>> __flush_tlb_all(); >>> + >>> + arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode(); >>> } >>> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION >>> >> >> This sounds like a critical fix, i.e. a -stable candidate. Am I >> correct? > > I considered copying stable but then I decided that this is a debugging > feature > --- kernel_map_pages() is only defined if CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set and my > thinking was that stable kernels usually don't do this. > > > -boris > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |