[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16754: regressions - FAIL

To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:27:26 +0000
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:27:57 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16754: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 12:01 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This looks like a bug in the i386 kernel in Debian squeeze.
> 
> Suspicious that it happened right after a Debian point release -- would
> we have automatically picked up the latest kernel etc?

No, that's a manual change (which goes through the tester's own push
gate).

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16754: regressions - FAIL
  - From: xen . org
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16754: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16754: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Ian Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen mce bugfix
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Rename credit2 names to csched2_*
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16754: regressions - FAIL
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: make x86_mcinfo_reserve() clear its result buffer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.