[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] linux-3.9-rc0 regression from 3.8 SATA controller not detected under xen
>>> On 27.02.13 at 11:57, Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tuesday, February 26, 2013, 9:41:53 AM, you wrote: > >>>>> On 25.02.13 at 23:18, Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I can't get linux-3.9 rc0 to boot under xen-unstable. >>> It doesn't detect the s-ata controller, so it ends op with udev timing and >>> bailing out to busybox. >>> >>> I don't see a obvious error in the logs. > >> Perhaps because the log is far from being complete? There's a huge >> gap right before the first pciback message, yet that's quite likely >> the relevant part. > > Hi Jan / Konrad, > > Tried bisecting, but that ended up no where, so back to the logs... > > With v3.9-rc0 + xen, it's indeed missing a part of the log: > [ 4.141328] Brought up 6 CPUs > [ 4.142654] Grant tables using version 2 layout. > [ 4.142676] Grant table initialized > [ 4.142813] NET: Registered protocol family 16 > [ 4.145343] node 0 link 0: io port [1000, ffffff] > [ 4.145354] TOM: 00000000b0000000 aka 2816M > [ 4.145360] Fam 10h mmconf [mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff] > [ 4.145373] node 0 link 0: mmio [e0000000, efffffff] ==> none > [ 4.145381] node 0 link 0: mmio [f0000000, ffffffff] > [ 4.145388] node 0 link 0: mmio [a0000, bffff] > [ 4.145395] node 0 link 0: mmio [b0000000, dfffffff] > [ 4.145401] TOM2: 0000000250000000 aka 9472M > [ 4.145406] bus: [bus 00-07] on node 0 link 0 > [ 4.145411] bus: 00 [io 0x0000-0xffff] > [ 4.145415] bus: 00 [mem 0xf0000000-0xffffffff] > [ 4.145420] bus: 00 [mem 0x000a0000-0x000bffff] > [ 4.145424] bus: 00 [mem 0xb0000000-0xdfffffff] > [ 4.145429] bus: 00 [mem 0x250000000-0xfcffffffff] > [ 4.145702] ACPI: bus type pci registered > [ 4.146801] PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-ff] at [mem > 0xe0000000-0xefffffff] (base 0xe0000000) > [ 4.146812] PCI: not using MMCONFIG > [ 4.146817] PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access > [ 4.146822] PCI: Using configuration type 1 for extended access > [ 4.191935] bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0 > [ 4.192623] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device) > [ 4.192630] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device) > [ 4.192636] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions) > [ 4.192642] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device) > [ 4.195958] ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT > [ 4.199659] ACPI: Executed 3 blocks of module-level executable AML code > [ 4.204162] ACPI: Interpreter enabled > [ 4.204170] ACPI: (supports S0 S5) > [ 4.204181] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing > [ 4.204219] PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-ff] at [mem > 0xe0000000-0xefffffff] (base 0xe0000000) > [ 4.205800] PCI: MMCONFIG at [mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff] reserved in > ACPI motherboa[ 7.107382] usb usb5: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, > idProduct=0001 > > > The line in the serial-log also seems to be truncated somehow and the rest of > the info missing .. > > When booting v3.9-rc0 Baremetal the complete pci enumeration seems to be in > between: > ... > Tried booting with pci=nommconf,nocrs but to no avail. > Are there any other boot options i could try to narrow it down ? You first of all want to make sure you get a complete log. "sync_console" or "serial_tx_buffer=<size>" are your friends... But then again I would guess it's not bus enumeration related. Did the multiple-MSI-vectors suspicion lead nowhere? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |