Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use 'timer='delay_for_missed_ticks'

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible 
to use 'timer='delay_for_missed_ticks'"):
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:43:10PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Doh! That was very likely a brainfart by me...
> 
> And by me in the git commit description :-(

Heh.

> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:30:18 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use
>  'timer='delay_for_missed_ticks'
> 
> The assertion only allows values of 1 (no_delay_for_missed_ticks)
> up to 3 (one_missed_tick_pending). It should be possible to
> use the value of 0 (delay_for_missed_ticks) for the timer configuration
> option.
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.cambell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel