Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 16690: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 16690: regressions 
- FAIL"):
> The kernel build didn't even start when these failed, yet the
> real reason for the failure also isn't clear to me. Trying to glue
> together the matching pieces, I think is goes like this:
> 
...
> Cloning http://xenbits.xen.org/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg to linux-2.6.18-xen.hg.
> ...
> requesting all changes
> adding changesets
> adding manifests
> adding file changes
> transaction abort!
> rollback completed
> abort: Connection reset by peer
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/home/osstest/build.16690.build-i386-oldkern/xen-unstable'
> make[2]: *** [linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/.valid-src] Error 255
> make[1]: *** [linux-2.6-xen-install] Error 2
> make: *** [install-kernels] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory 
> `/home/osstest/build.16690.build-i386-oldkern/xen-unstable'
> 
> The odd thing being that neither 4.1 nor master had similar
> problems in their tests. Do we simply need to wait for another
> run?

This is indeed odd.  I'm hoping it's a network glitch and that hg is
simply printing its messages in a funny order.  In which case the next
run ought to work.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel