Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] AMD IOMMU: don't BUG() when we don't have to

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 15.02.13 at 18:34, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/15/2013 11:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> find_iommu_for_device() can easily return NULL instead, as all of its
>> callers are prepared for that.
> 
> This patch is obsoleted by the second patch ("[PATCH 2/4] AMD IOMMU: 
> cover all functions of a device even if ACPI only tells us of func 0"), 
> isn't it?

Yes it is, but it is an (I think) obviously correct thing to do, and
hence much more of a backporting candidate than the other one.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel