[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] netback Oops then xenwatch stuck in D state
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:20:32PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > On 13/02/13 18:37, Wei Liu wrote: > > A slightly upgraded version of the *UNTESTED* patch. > > > > > > Wei. > > > > ----8<---- > > commit df4c929d034cec7043fbd96ba89833eb639c336e > > Author: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed Feb 13 18:17:01 2013 +0000 > > > > netback: fix netbk_count_requests > > > > There are two paths in the original code, a) test against work_to_do, > > b) test > > against first->size, could return 0 even when error happens. > > > > Simply return -1 in error paths should work. Modify all error paths to > > return > > -1 to be consistent. > > You also need to remove the netbk_tx_err() after checking the result of > netbk_count_requests(). Otherwise you will have a double xenvif_put(), > which will screw up ref counting. I just realized that we were talking about different code path when I walked home. The path you mentioned is correct. As excution flow should never reach there if there is error in netbk_count_requests. The path I'm not sure is that in the netbk_fatal_tx_err, it calls xenvif_carrier_off which calls xenvif_put, and then it calls xenvif_put, which is likely to mess up the refcount. Wei. > > I would also suggest returning -EINVAL from netbk_count_requests(). > > It not clear to me how this will fix the original oops though. > > David > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > > b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > > index 103294d..0e0162e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > > @@ -913,13 +913,13 @@ static int netbk_count_requests(struct xenvif *vif, > > if (frags >= work_to_do) { > > netdev_err(vif->dev, "Need more frags\n"); > > netbk_fatal_tx_err(vif); > > - return -frags; > > + return -1; > > } > > > > if (unlikely(frags >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS)) { > > netdev_err(vif->dev, "Too many frags\n"); > > netbk_fatal_tx_err(vif); > > - return -frags; > > + return -1; > > } > > > > memcpy(txp, RING_GET_REQUEST(&vif->tx, cons + frags), > > @@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ static int netbk_count_requests(struct xenvif *vif, > > if (txp->size > first->size) { > > netdev_err(vif->dev, "Frag is bigger than frame.\n"); > > netbk_fatal_tx_err(vif); > > - return -frags; > > + return -1; > > } > > > > first->size -= txp->size; > > @@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ static int netbk_count_requests(struct xenvif *vif, > > netdev_err(vif->dev, "txp->offset: %x, size: %u\n", > > txp->offset, txp->size); > > netbk_fatal_tx_err(vif); > > - return -frags; > > + return -1; > > } > > } while ((txp++)->flags & XEN_NETTXF_more_data); > > return frags; > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |