Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 15450: regressions - FAIL - PUSHED

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 12.02.13 at 20:15, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We need to decide what to do with xen-4.2-testing.hg non-staging.  I
> would be tempted to rewind it, if that isn't a horrible thing to do.
> It's not as bad with hg as it is with git: aiui if you pull from a
> rewound repo, nothing bad happens.
> 
> I think this can be done with hg strip.

Question is - do we need to do anything here at all? With IanC
apparently already having found the reason for the regression,
can't we just get that committed to -unstable, and once pushed
there put it here (and on 4.1-testing) too?

I would be more concerned about the tree's state when close
to a release, but we still have about two weeks until we ought
to cut -rc1 there.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel