[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16014: regressions - FAIL
flight 16014 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/16014/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 15643-bisect test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 16012-bisect Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-pv 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail pass in 15817 test-amd64-i386-xl 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail pass in 15817 test-amd64-amd64-pv 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 15817 pass in 16014 test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 15817 pass in 16014 test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 9 guest-localmigrate fail in 15817 pass in 16014 test-amd64-i386-qemut-win 7 windows-install fail in 15817 pass in 16014 test-amd64-i386-qemut-win-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail in 15817 pass in 16014 test-amd64-amd64-qemut-win 7 windows-install fail in 15817 pass in 16014 test-amd64-amd64-win 7 windows-install fail in 15817 pass in 16014 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 5 xen-boot fail like 15442 test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail like 15442 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win 7 windows-install fail like 15442 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-qemut-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-qemut-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-qemut-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass version targeted for testing: xen fd997a96d448 baseline version: xen 6c1b12c884b4 ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: David Scott <dave.scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> Matthew Daley <mattjd@xxxxxxxxx> ------------------------------------------------------------ jobs: build-amd64 pass build-armhf pass build-i386 pass build-amd64-oldkern pass build-i386-oldkern pass build-amd64-pvops pass build-i386-pvops pass test-amd64-amd64-xl pass test-amd64-i386-xl fail test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd pass test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel pass test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu fail test-amd64-amd64-pair pass test-amd64-i386-pair pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin fail test-amd64-amd64-pv pass test-amd64-i386-pv fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf fail test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-i386-qemut-win-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-amd64-win fail test-amd64-i386-win fail test-amd64-amd64-qemut-win fail test-amd64-i386-qemut-win fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs images: /home/xc_osstest/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Not pushing. ------------------------------------------------------------ changeset: 26523:fd997a96d448 tag: tip user: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> date: Fri Feb 08 11:06:04 2013 +0100 x86: debugging code for testing 16Tb support on smaller memory systems Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> changeset: 26522:ffd30e7388ad user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> date: Thu Feb 07 14:21:47 2013 +0000 oxenstored: Enforce a maximum message size of 4096 bytes The maximum size of a message is part of the protocol spec in xen/include/public/io/xs_wire.h Before this patch a client which sends an overly large message can cause a buffer read overrun. Note if a badly-behaved client sends a very large message then it will be difficult for them to make their connection work again-- they will probably need to reboot. Signed-off-by: David Scott <dave.scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changeset: 26521:2c0fd406f02c user: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> date: Thu Feb 07 14:21:44 2013 +0000 tools/ocaml: oxenstored: Be more paranoid about ring reading oxenstored makes use of the OCaml Xenbus bindings, in which the function xs_ring_read in tools/ocaml/libs/xb/xs_ring_stubs.c is used to read from the shared memory Xenstore ring. This function does not correctly handle all possible (prod, cons) states when MASK_XENSTORE_IDX(prod) > MASK_XENSTORE_IDX(cons). The root cause is the use of the unmasked values of prod and cons to calculate to_read. If prod is set to an out-of-range value, the ring peer can cause to_read to be too large or even negative. This allows the ring peer to force oxenstored to read and write out of range for the buffers leading to a crash or possibly to privilege escalation. Correct this by masking the values of cons and prod at the start, so we only deal with masked values. This makes the logic simpler, as semantically inappropriate values of the upper bits of the ring pointers are simply ignored. The same vulnerability does not exist in the ring writer because the only use made of the unmasked value is the check which prevents the prod pointer overtaking the cons pointer. A ring peer which defeats this check will suffer only lost data. However, additionally, precautions need to be taken to ensure that req_cons and req_prod are only read once in each function. Without the use of volatile or some asm construct, the compiler can "prove" that req_cons and req_prod do not change unexpectedly and is permitted to "amplify" the read of (say) req_cons into two reads at different times, giving two different values for use as cons, and then use the two sources of cons interchangeably. (The use of xen_mb() does not forbid this.) Therefore do the reads of req_cons and req_prod through a volatile pointer in both xs_ring_read and xs_ring_write. This is currently believed to be a theoretical vulnerability as we are not aware of any compilers which amplify reads in this way. This is a security issue, part of XSA-38 / CVE-2013-0215. Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Matthew Daley <mattjd@xxxxxxxxx> Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changeset: 26520:6c1b12c884b4 user: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> date: Tue Feb 05 15:47:41 2013 +0000 xen: enable stubdom on a per arch basis ... and disable on ARM (for now). Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Committed-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> ======================================== commit 2a1354d655d816feaad7dbdb8364f40a208439c1 Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Jan 17 15:52:16 2013 +0000 e1000: fix compile warning introduced by security fix, and debugging e33f918c19e393900b95a2bb6b10668dfe96a8f2, the fix for XSA-41, and its cherry picks in 4.2 and 4.1 introduced this compiler warning: hw/e1000.c:641: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void In upstream qemu (where this change came from), e1000_receive returns a value used by queueing machinery to decide whether to try resubmitting the packet later. Returning "size" means that the packet has been dealt with and should not be retried. In this old branch (aka qemu-xen-traditional), this machinery is absent and e1000_receive returns void. Fix the return statement. Also add a debugging statement along the lines of the others in this function. Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |