Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] seperate xen checkpoint file as three parts(for xen-4.1.2)

[éç <aware.why@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On 06/01/2013 02:27, "éç" <aware.why@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Pasi KÃrkkÃinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 02:52:01PM +0800, ?????? wrote:
>>>
>>> Â ÂHow to submit a patch to the xen source trunk except through hg mecurial?
>>> Â ÂDoes anybody ever go through such thing by sending the patch to the mail
>>> Â Âlist?
>>>
>>
>> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Submitting_Xen_Patches
>>
>> -- Pasi
>>
> ÂHow to submit a patch to the xen source trunk except through hg mecurial?
> ÂDoes anybody ever go through such thing by sending the patch to the
> mailÂlist?
>
> My question is thatÂwhy did a patch submitted by the mail list get no
> attentions?Â

It had no motivation as to why anyone should care to split the state file.
It was not submitted in the required form with a signed-off-by line, and
prerferably with the patch in-line rather than as an attachment. And it was
not submitted against development tip of xen-unstable, but against an older
stable branch which is not accepting new features.

Â-- Keir

> Whether it has no value of reference or not, Âone of the core members will
> more or less give any response to it.
>
>

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

This feature could be configured to be optional in make file configuration according to individual preference.

for example, if i want to restore a vm with different configuration from mac address to vm-id, you need to override the first part of the state file and maybe also the third part is needed to be modified such as the bytes range Âfor mac address in Âqemu state section.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel