Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/04] HVM firmware passthrough

[Ross Philipson <Ross.Philipson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Will [mailto:ketuzsezr@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 7:00 PM
> To: Ross Philipson
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/04] HVM firmware passthrough
> 
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Ross Philipson <Ross.Philipson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> >> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Philipson
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:55 PM
> >> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/04] HVM firmware passthrough
> >>
> >> This patch series introduces support of loading external blocks of
> >> firmware
> >> into a guest. These blocks can currently contain SMBIOS and/or ACPI
> >> firmware
> >> information that is used by HVMLOADER to modify a guests virtual
> >> firmware at
> >> startup. These modules are only used by HVMLOADER and are effectively
> >> discarded after HVMLOADER has completed.
> > ...
> >
> > Is there anything else I need to do to get this patch series accepted?
> 
> Address the comments we had. I believe it was on making this be part of
> "xl" guest config parsing.

Oh I thought I did. I said I would submit a separate set of patches for
the work in xl once the earlier bits were in. Is that not an acceptable
approach?

Thanks
Ross

> >
> > Thanks
> > Ross
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> >

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel