[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Resizing block devices live?
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:06:56PM +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 13:52 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > > One of the requests from the xenorg.uservoice.com page that had a > > > moderate amount of interest was to allow block devices to be resized. > > > There's a description here: > > > > > > > > https://xenorg.uservoice.com/forums/172169-xen-development/suggestions/3140313-implement-block-device-resize > > > > > > > > > I have no idea what this would take -- can anyone comment? > > > > Doesn't that already work? I thought this was patch in the PV block > > drivers ages ago... > > > > Yes, http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XenParavirtOps lists it under 2.6.36. > > > > Maybe this is a missing feature of (lib)xl vs xend? > > > > "xm help" doesn't show a "block-resize" command, nor does grepping through > tools for "resize" turn up anything. > > Would someone be willing to do some investigation into whether such a > command is implemented in the protocol, and what it would take to get a "xm > block-resize" command working? (Not necessarily do it, but have an idea > what probably needs to be done.) Looking at the history it looks to be: 1fa73be6be65028a7543bba8f14474b42e064a1b which is commit 1fa73be6be65028a7543bba8f14474b42e064a1b Author: K. Y. Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Mar 11 13:42:26 2010 -0800 xen/front: Propagate changed size of VBDs Support dynamic resizing of virtual block devices. This patch supports both file backed block devices as well as physical devices that can be dynamically resized on the host side. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c index 60006b7..f47b096 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c @@ -930,9 +930,24 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info) unsigned int binfo; int err; - if ((info->connected == BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED) || - (info->connected == BLKIF_STATE_SUSPENDED) ) + switch (info->connected) { + case BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED: + /* + * Potentially, the back-end may be signalling + * a capacity change; update the capacity. + */ + err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend, + "sectors", "%Lu", §ors); + if (XENBUS_EXIST_ERR(err)) + return; + printk(KERN_INFO "Setting capacity to %Lu\n", + sectors); + set_capacity(info->gd, sectors); + + /* fall through */ + case BLKIF_STATE_SUSPENDED: return; + } dev_dbg(&info->xbdev->dev, "%s:%s.\n", __func__, info->xbdev->otherend); So it should be altering the 'sectors' value and just writting the backend state from XenbusStateConnected to XenbusStateConnected. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |