[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: find a better location for the real-mode trampoline
>>> On 18.12.12 at 14:22, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Il 18/12/2012 14:07, Jan Beulich ha scritto: >>>>> On 30.11.12 at 09:33, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> On 29.11.12 at 18:34, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On some machines, the location at 0x40e does not point to the beginning >>>> of the EBDA. Rather, it points to the beginning of the BIOS-reserved >>>> area of the EBDA, while the option ROMs place their data below that >>>> segment. >>>> >>>> For this reason, 0x413 is actually a better source than 0x40e to get >>>> the location of the real-mode trampoline. But it is even better to >>>> fetch the information from the multiboot structure, where the boot >>>> loader has placed the data for us already. >>> >>> I think if anything we really should make this a minimum calculation >>> of all three (sanity checked) values, rather than throwing the other >>> sources out. It's just not certain enough that we can trust all >>> multiboot implementations. >> >> I never saw a response from you on this one - were you >> intending to follow up, or did you (silently) expect us to sort >> this out? > > No, just busy. I agree that checking all three is best. However, there > is at least one known case where 0x40e doesn't work, so 0x413 and > multiboot should be enough. Can you provide more detail about this specific case? In particular, what value 0x40e in fact has there? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |