[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] stubdom: Change vTPM shared page ABI
Ok why don't we go with backend/vtpm2. That seems to be the less intrusive approach. On 12/10/2012 04:58 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 21:25 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:+ snprintf(path, 512, "backend/vtpm/%u/%u/feature-protocol-v2", (unsigned int) tpmif->domid, tpmif->handle); + if ((err = xenbus_write(XBT_NIL, path, "1"))) + { + /* if we got an error here we should carefully remove the interface and then return */ + TPMBACK_ERR("Unable to write feature-protocol-v2 node: %s\n", err); + free(err); + remove_tpmif(tpmif); + goto error_post_irq; + } +My preference is still to do away with the versioning stuff since tpm is just getting released.It is present in the 2.6.18-xen tree and has made its way into distros, at least SLES11.Its not even in linux yet so there isno confusion. We can even merge the linux patches together and resubmit as one if thats preferrable. Konrad, Ian, your final votes on that?I am up for just removing the versioning stuff - and if one really wants to be fool-proof - rename the 'backend/vtpm' to 'backend/vtpm2' Perhaps? Attachment:
smime.p7s _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |