Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: use qemu-xen (upstream QEMU) as device model by default

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Monday, December 3, 2012, 5:24:43 PM, you wrote:
> 
> > On 27/11/12 16:17, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> >> index 9d20086..c40f597 100644
> >> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> >> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> >> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int libxl__domain_build_info_setdefault(libxl__gc *gc,
> >>      if (!b_info->device_model_version) {
> >>          if (b_info->type == LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_HVM)
> >>              b_info->device_model_version =
> >> -                LIBXL_DEVICE_MODEL_VERSION_QEMU_XEN_TRADITIONAL;
> >> +                LIBXL_DEVICE_MODEL_VERSION_QEMU_XEN;
> 
> > Is there anyway we may keep qemu-traditional as default for NetBSD?
> > Upstream Qemu is not working on NetBSD, and I'm afraid it needs some
> > heavy patching.
> 
> > Could a helper function be added to libxl_{netbsd/linux}.c to decide
> > which device model to use?
> 
> And shouldn't the example configuration files and documentation be patched as 
> well ?

The example config files don't have anything on the device model.
However I do need to update the xl man page.
Thanks for the reminder!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel