Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06/12] arm: avoid allocating the heaps over modules or xen itself.

[Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>]

At 17:19 +0000 on 29 Nov (1354209553), Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 17:06 +0000, Tim Deegan wrote:
> > At 16:23 +0000 on 13 Nov (1352823798), Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  xen/arch/arm/setup.c |   89 
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > >  1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > @@ -215,8 +260,30 @@ static void __init setup_mm(unsigned long dtb_paddr, 
> > > size_t dtb_size)
> > >      copy_from_paddr(device_tree_flattened, dtb_paddr, dtb_size, 
> > > BUFFERABLE);
> > >  
> > >      /* Add non-xenheap memory */
> > > -    init_boot_pages(pfn_to_paddr(xenheap_mfn_start + xenheap_pages),
> > > -                    pfn_to_paddr(xenheap_mfn_start + xenheap_pages + 
> > > domheap_pages));
> > > +    s = ram_start;
> > > +    while ( s < ram_end )
> > > +    {
> > > +        paddr_t n = ram_end;
> > > +
> > > +        e = next_module(s, &n);
> > 
> > Does this DTRT if there's a module starting at exactly ram_start?
> 
> I should probably try it...
> 
> I think in this case next_module will return the start of that module,
> so e = s, and it will also set n to the end of the module.

Yes, I see; you go nce around the loop with a 0-length range, which
init_boot_pages will ignore.  Fine. 

Tim.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel