[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] Make all public hosting providers eligible for the pre-disclosure list
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > + <p>Here as a rule of thumb, "public hosting provider" means If we're going to include software vendors, we need some simple criteria to define what a "real" software vendor is. The idea of asking for a link from cloud providers pointing to public rates and a security policy, which Ian Jackson proffered, was a good one. I suppose we could do something similar for software providers: a link to a web page with either download-able install images, or prices, perhaps?
Ack. I think it would be good to also include something like: Ack. I wonder if we shouldn't also include under the list of "pre-disclosure I think this is a slightly separate topic -- I think it would be easier if we handle criteria for inclusion separately from procedure for removal / reinstatement. Also, and I understand this is most likely taking things way too far, I Well that might work for open-source providers, but would it work for say, Rackspace, Linode, Amazon? Huawei? Or another company like Citrix, whose product team isn't heavily involved in open-source community things? It might be sensible to say that such a signature would be considered in the application process -- that would allow small groups that are very active in the OSS community to balance out large companies that can spend a lot on marketing &c to make themselves known. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |