[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [DOCDAY] Maintenance Release Policy
Lars (I presume it was he who added this TODO) would like to have a policy written down. http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Document_Days/TODO#Document_Policy_on_Maintenance_Releases says: Which releases are supported, for how long. Owners. As well as a mechanism for individuals (or vendors) to take ownership of older releases (as is the case for Xen 4.3). (I think s/4.3/3.4/ was intended in the above) I thought it would be worth sketching out my understanding of the informal process we have for people to pick holes in. I've tried to stick to what we actually do rather than defining policy. Ian. 8<-------------------- Each new Xen release X.Y.0 starts a new stable maintenance branch. Each such branch is in in its own mercurial repository xen-X.Y-testing.hg. Releases happen roughly every 3 months. The first release on a stable branch is often sooner and as the branch reaches the end of its life the interval may be longer. In general Xen.org supports the two most recent stable branches at any given time. When a new X.Y.0 release is made there is usually one more release on the to-be-retired stable branch to mop up any loose patches sitting in the repo at which point the branch is retired. For example we are currently in the 4.3 development cycle and are supporting two stable branches: 4.1-testing and 4.2-testing. After 4.2.0 was released there was one more release in the 4.0-testing stream (4.0.4 IIRC) and then the 4.0 branch was been retired. XXX how did Jan become stable maintainer, I think he just volunteered at the developer meeting and was accepted via the usual consensus driven approach? Lets try: Each stable branch has a maintainer who is nominated/volunteers and is accepted via consensus among the maintainers and committers (XXX or just committers?). For the branches maintained by Xen.org this would usually be one of the xen-unstable committers or maintainers. However community members can step up to maintain a release once Xen.org no longer does so (e.g. as happened with Keith and xen-3.4-testing.hg). Currently Jan Beulich is the stable maintainer for both 4.1-testing and 4.2-testing having taken over from Keir Fraser when 4.2.0 was released. Jan delegates tools backports to Ian Jackson. Community member Keith Coleman continues to maintain the 3.4-testing branch (XXX does he still?) which he took over when 4.1.0 was released. No new development happens in the X.Y-testing branches, instead changesets are backported from xen-unstable. Where this is not possible (perhaps unstable has moved on such that the patch cannot be applied or the approach used in unstable is otherwise not valid for the stable branch) then a specific fix can be created for the stable branch. However it is a requirement that the issue will always be fixed in unstable first (this is to avoid regressions on the next stable release). In general only bug fixes are accepted into stable branches and new features are not normally accepted. (There can be exceptions, e.g. it was agreed that 4.2.1 would take a more relaxed approach to features which improved xl compatibility with xm). As time passes each stable branch becomes more conservative and the barrier to accepting a patch for backport becomes higher. Changesets are nominated for inclusion in the stable branch by making a request to the stable maintainer on xen-devel either by noting it as such in the submission of the original patch to xen-unstable or by a subsequent explicit email to xen-devel. In addition as part of the the stable release process the stable maintainer will send one or more requests to xen-devel soliciting suggestions for patches which should be included. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |