[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC/PATCH] XENMEM_claim_pages (subop of an existing) hypercall
>>> On 15.11.12 at 11:47, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 22:23 +0000, Dan Magenheimer wrote: >> This is a first cut of the hypervisor patch of the proposed >> XENMEM_claim_pages hypercall/subop. > > Who is expected to be able to call this? I think a XENMEM subop implies > that the guest itself, plus perhaps any controlling stubdom (e.g. qemu) > could call > it, which I don't think is desirable. > > Should this be limited to the toolstack only and therefore be a subop of > domctl or some other hypercall? Oh, yes, absolutely. Whether making it a domctl (where it doesn't belong except for that aspect) I'm not that sure, though. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |