Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).

[Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx>]

ack.
I'm happy to test a 2nd round, if you CC me on any fixed patches (just
in case I'm not monitoring lkml / xen-devel on that particular day)

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:00:29PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
>> I'm not sure it matters, but I'm testing against a changeset about a week 
>> old:
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=1c4a5b37b55c56e49135e65728137f54288d1fe6
>
> I was able to reproduce it with Xen 4.2 so found the culprit.
>
> .. And then another issue :-(
>
>>
>> Plus patches specific to XenClient Enterprise.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:46:09PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> >> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> > The end result is this is a nice set of patches where there is only
>> >> > _one_ change in the x86 code (and it is just more of dealing with
>> >> > error case) - and the rest are all done in Xen side.
>> >>
>> >> I'm sorry to report that this series doesn't seem to work in my setup
>> >> against xen-unstable.
>> >>
>> >> To verify that it was, in fact this patch series, and not another Xen
>> >> regression - I swapped out the kernel with this patch series, with an
>> >> identical one, replacing only this series with your acpi-s3.v9 branch
>> >> - and everything worked fine.
>> >
>> > Thanks for testing it!
>> >
>> > I had tested it with Xen 4.1.3, which could be doing something different.
>> > Will see what is up.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel