[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).
On 18/10/12 18:42, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> As for 'perf', since Xen already provides a virtual PMU for HVM guests
>> It's not clear why we would spend the effort to implement another
>> mechanism for PV guests (instead of using the virtual PMU from a PVH guest).
>
> Would that allow one to evaluate the performance/bottlenecks that the
> hypervisor might have?
Not right now, no. But I don't so why it couldn't be possible.
David
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
