Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 2/6]: PVH: use native irq, enable callback, use HVM ring ops, smp, ...

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 01:30 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> PVH: make gdt_frames[]/gdt_ents into a union with {gdtaddr, gdtsz}, PVH
> only needs to send down gdtaddr and gdtsz. irq.c: PVH uses
> native_irq_ops. vcpu hotplug is currently not available for PVH.
> events.c: setup callback vector for PVH. smp.c: This pertains to
> bringing up smp vcpus. PVH runs in ring 0, so syscalls are native.
> Also, the vcpu context is send down via the hcall to be set in the
> vmcs. gdtaddr and gdtsz are unionionized as PVH only needs to send
> these two to be set in the vmcs. Finally, PVH ring ops uses HVM paths
> for xenbus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h |   11 +++++-
>  arch/x86/xen/irq.c                   |    5 ++-
>  arch/x86/xen/p2m.c                   |    2 +-
>  arch/x86/xen/smp.c                   |   75
> ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
> |    4 +- drivers/xen/events.c                 |    9 ++++-
>  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c   |    3 +-

This patch seems to have been horribly whitespace damaged.

Have you seen "git send-email" ? It's very useful for avoiding this sort
of thing and also takes a lot of the grunt work out of reposting a
series.

It also chains the patches as replies to the introductory zero-th mail
-- which is something I've been meaning to ask you to do for a while.
It's useful because it joins the series together in a thread which makes
it easier to keep track of in my INBOX.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel