[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 2/7]: PVH: use native irq, enable callback, use HVM ring ops, ...
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:52:17 +0100 Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c | 4 +++- > > drivers/xen/events.c | 9 ++++++++- > > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c | 3 ++- > > 7 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h > > b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h index 555f94d..f11edb0 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h > > @@ -143,7 +143,13 @@ struct vcpu_guest_context { > > struct cpu_user_regs user_regs; /* User-level CPU > > registers */ struct trap_info trap_ctxt[256]; /* Virtual > > IDT */ unsigned long ldt_base, ldt_ents; /* > > LDT (linear address, # ents) */ > > - unsigned long gdt_frames[16], gdt_ents; /* GDT (machine > > frames, # ents) */ > > + union { > > + struct { > > + /* PV: GDT (machine frames, # ents).*/ > > + unsigned long gdt_frames[16], gdt_ents; > > + } s; > > + unsigned long gdtaddr, gdtsz; /* PVH: GDTR addr > > and size */ > > I've pointed out a few times that I think this is wrong -- gdtaddr and > gdtsz will overlap each other in the union. I'm not sure how it even > works, unless the hypervisor is ignoring one or the other. You need: > > union { > struct { > unsigned long gdt_frames[16], gdt_ents; > } pv; > struct { > unsigned long gdtaddr, gdtsz; > } pvh; > } gdt; > > (I've gone with naming the union gdt instead of u. You might want > therefore to also drop the gdt prefix from the members?) Is it worth it, I mean, making it a union. Would you be OK if I just used gdt_frames[0] and gdt_ends for gdtaddr and size? thanks Mukesh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |