[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Dom0 physical networking/swiotlb/something issue in 3.7-rc1
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 01:18:16PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 13:10 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:59:49AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:28:08AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > Hi Konrad, > > > > > > > > The following patch causes fairly large packet loss when transmitting > > > > from dom0 to the physical network, at least with my tg3 hardware, but I > > > > assume it can impact anything which uses this interface. > > > > > > Ah, that would explain why one of my machines suddenly started > > > developing checksum errors (and had a tg3 card). I hadn't gotten > > > deep into it. > > > > > > > > I suspect that the issue is that the compound pages allocated in this > > > > way are not backed by contiguous mfns and so things fall apart when the > > > > driver tries to do DMA. > > > > > > So this should also be easily reproduced on barmetal with 'iommu=soft' > > > then. > > > > > > > > However I don't understand why the swiotlb is not fixing this up > > > > successfully? The tg3 driver seems to use pci_map_single on this data. > > > > Any thoughts? Perhaps the swiotlb (either generically or in the Xen > > > > backend) doesn't correctly handle compound pages? > > > > > > The assumption is that it is just a page. I am surprsed that the other > > > IOMMUs aren't hitting this as well - ah, that is b/c they do handle > > > a virtual address of more than one PAGE_SIZE.. > > > > So.. the GART one (AMD poor man IOTLB - was used for AGP card > > translation, but can still be used as an IOMMU - and is still present on > > some AMD machines), looks to suffer the same problem. > > > > But perhaps not - can you explain to me if a compound page > > is virtually contingous? One of the things the GART does for > > pci_map_single is call page_to_phys(p), feeds the CPU physical address > > (and size) into the GART engine to setup the mapping. > > > > If compound pages are virtually (and physically on barmetal) contingous > > - this ought to work. But if they are not, then this should also break on > > AMD machines with tg3 and a AMD GART enabled. > > AFAIK compound pages are always physically contiguous. i.e. given a > "struct page *page" which is the head of a compound page you can do > "page++" to walk through its constituent frames. > > I'm not sure about virtually contiguous. Obviously if they are in lowmem > then the 1-1 map combined with the fact that they are physically > contiguous makes them virtually contiguous too. I'm not sure what > happens if they are highmem -- since kmap (or whatever) would need to do > some extra work in this case. I've not looked but I don't recall > noticing this in the past... I think it also depends on how they are allocated - if your use GFP_DMA32 they will be in lowmem. And since the networking is using that by default they would be in the 1-1 map. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |