[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13934: regressions - FAIL

On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 10:35 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13934: regressions - 
> FAIL"):
> > This means the bug is in make or in the makefiles.  Let me investigate
> > further...
> Subject: [PATCH] build, docs: Do not ignore install-docs errors
> In the toplevel Makefile "install-docs" (depended on by "install" and
> hence "dist"), but not "build", ignores errors.
> This was inherited from before 24563:4271634e4c86, prior to which the
> ||true seems intended to handle failures of check_pkgs.  Nowadays we
> handle docs tools individually in the docs makefiles so there is no
> need for this ||true here.

The docs/fig/Makefile doesn't seem to gracefully handle the absence of
fig2dev, I don't think we want this as an unconditional build dep do we?

It looks like we've inadvertently added an unconditional dependency on
pod2text too.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.