Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 13/14] PPC: e500: Map PIO space into core memory region

[Scott Wood <scottwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/08/2012 03:48:42 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 08.10.2012, at 22:20, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On 10/08/2012 07:23:52 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On PPC, we don't have PIO. So usually PIO space behind a PCI  
> bridge is
> >> accessible via MMIO. Do this mapping explicitly by mapping the PIO  
> space
> >> of our PCI bus into a memory region that lives in memory space.
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> hw/ppc/e500.c    |    3 +--
> >> hw/ppce500_pci.c |    9 +++++++--
> >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/e500.c b/hw/ppc/e500.c
> >> index d23f9b2..857d4dc 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppc/e500.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/e500.c
> >> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@
> >> #define MPC8544_PCI_REGS_BASE      (MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE +  
> 0x8000ULL)
> >> #define MPC8544_PCI_REGS_SIZE      0x1000ULL
> >> #define MPC8544_PCI_IO             0xE1000000ULL
> >> -#define MPC8544_PCI_IOLEN          0x10000ULL
> >> #define MPC8544_UTIL_BASE          (MPC8544_CCSRBAR_BASE +  
> 0xe0000ULL)
> >> #define MPC8544_SPIN_BASE          0xEF000000ULL
> >> @@ -511,7 +510,7 @@ void ppce500_init(PPCE500Params *params)
> >>     if (!pci_bus)
> >>         printf("couldn't create PCI controller!\n");
> >> -    isa_mmio_init(MPC8544_PCI_IO, MPC8544_PCI_IOLEN);
> >> +    sysbus_mmio_map(sysbus_from_qdev(dev), 1, MPC8544_PCI_IO);
> >>     if (pci_bus) {
> >>         /* Register network interfaces. */
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppce500_pci.c b/hw/ppce500_pci.c
> >> index 92b1dc0..27c6d7d 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppce500_pci.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppce500_pci.c
> >> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
> >> #define PCIE500_ALL_SIZE      0x1000
> >> #define PCIE500_REG_SIZE      (PCIE500_ALL_SIZE - PCIE500_REG_BASE)
> >> +#define PCIE500_PCI_IOLEN     0x10000ULL
> >
> > I don't think this belongs in ppce500_pci.c -- it's board config  
> (or rather, a board-related default of something that is supposed to  
> be software configurable), just like the base address.
> Actually this one is fixed in PCI. There are only 64k PIO ports.
Are you sure about that?  Certainly that's the limit on x86 due to the  
I/O instructions, and some (buggy?) PCI devices might have trouble with  
larger I/O addresses, but I didn't think it was actually illegal.  Some  
mpc85xx boards have default configs with larger I/O windows (though  
probably not for any good reason).
> > Any chance of similarly constraining PCI MMIO to its proper window?
>
> We can't distinguish between inbound and outbound right now. If we  
> only need to restrict CPU -> PCI access, then yes.
Better than nothing. :-)

-Scott

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel