Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/6] xen-blkfront: handle backend CLOSED without CLOSING

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
>>>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
>>>> CLOSED.  If a backend does transition to CLOSED too soon then the
>>>> frontend may not see the CLOSING state and will not properly shutdown.
>>>>
>>>> So, treat an unexpected backend CLOSED state the same as CLOSING.
>>>
>>> Didn't handle the frontend block device being mounted. Updated patch here.
>>
>> Konrad, can you ack this updated patch if you're happy with it.
> 
> Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Or should I just carry it in my for-jens-3.7 bug-fixes queue and ask
> Jen to pull it once rc0 is out?

This seems easiest, if Jan is happy with the patch.

Thanks.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel