Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 0/8]: PVH (PV guest with extensions)

[Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:35:28 +0100
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 22:28 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:54:23 +0100
> > Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 20:12 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, I've made all the changes from prev RFC patch submission.
> > > 
> > > Did I miss the patch with the changes to arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S
> > > which declare the features which are used here as supported by
> > > the kernel image?
> > > 
> > > Ian.
> > > 
> > 
> > Strange, adding following to head.S
> > 
> >         ELFNOTE(Xen, XEN_ELFNOTE_PADDR_OFFSET,   _ASM_PTR 0)
> >         ELFNOTE(Xen, XEN_ELFNOTE_GUEST_PVH, .long 1)  <--------
> > 
> > and xenstore won't start in dom0. What gives?
> 
> I have no idea, I can't think of any way that xenstored would be able
> to even see the notes given in the dom0 kernel image.
> 
> Are you sure you only that one exact change?

You Ok with XEN_ELFNOTE_GUEST_PVH, or should I call it
XEN_ELFNOTE_PV_EXTENSIONS. Please LMK.

tanks
Mukesh

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel