Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/11] x86/xen: Register resources required by kexec-tools

[Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:40:01AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.12 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> >>> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:06:32PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >> +  for (i = 0; i < cpus; ++i) {
> >
> > Any specific reason for using '++i' instead of 'i++' ?
>
> For people occasionally also writing C++ code this is the
> canonical form.

Heh... I have not written any C++ code since the end
of my C++ course at my university (~18 years).
I am just prefer '++i' instead of 'i++'.
That is it.

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel